블로그 등록

NewJeans 'How Sweet' Copyright Lawsuit 2026: What Happened?

B

BackToLink Editorial

4 min read한국어 →
Key Takeaways

NewJeans' 'How Sweet' faces a U.S. copyright lawsuit. Learn about the claims, ADOR's strong denial, and the potential impact on K-pop's global copyright landscape in 2026.

  • 1Who filed the lawsuit against NewJeans' 'How Sweet' in 2026? → The lawsuit was filed by four songwriters, including Audrey Amacost, who claim their demo song 'One of a Kind' was plagiarized.
  • 2What is the basis for the plagiarism claim against 'How Sweet'? → The plaintiffs allege that the first verse melody and structure of 'How Sweet' are very similar to their demo song 'One of a Kind,' using the same tempo, key, and melodic sequences.
  • 3What is ADOR's official position on the plagiarism claims? → ADOR maintains that the plagiarism claims are 'groundless' and has stated they will respond aggressively to the lawsuit.
  • 4What are the key legal issues in the lawsuit? → The dispute involves alleged sharing of specific melody sequences and demands for royalty payments based on copyright infringement claims.
  • 5How does the global popularity of 'How Sweet' affect this lawsuit? → Its international success makes the lawsuit a significant issue for K-pop's global reputation and copyright discussions.
NewJeans 'How Sweet' Copyright Lawsuit 2026: What Happened?

NewJeans' hit song 'How Sweet' is facing a copyright infringement lawsuit in the United States, with their agency ADOR strongly denying the allegations and vowing to fight back. This legal battle has sparked significant interest among K-pop fans globally.

What Are the Specific Claims in the 'How Sweet' Copyright Lawsuit?

The controversy surrounding NewJeans' popular track 'How Sweet' has escalated with a lawsuit filed in the U.S. According to Billboard, four songwriters, including Audrey Amacost, allege that their demo song 'One of a Kind' was plagiarized by NewJeans in 'How Sweet.' The plaintiffs claim they submitted a demo to NewJeans' agency as a potential new song candidate early last year, but were later informed it wouldn't be used. However, they assert that the first verse melody and structure of 'How Sweet,' released about four months later, bears a striking resemblance to their demo. The lawsuit details technical analyses, pointing out that both songs allegedly share the same tempo, key, and specific melodic sequences, leading to their demand for royalty distribution. These detailed claims have naturally piqued the curiosity of fans and the general public.

What Is ADOR's Official Stance on the 'How Sweet' Plagiarism Allegations?

NewJeans' agency, ADOR, has issued a firm denial of the plagiarism allegations. The company stated that after confirming with the song's producer, BANA, there was absolutely no plagiarism involved. ADOR has made it clear that they intend to respond to this lawsuit with a strong and proactive legal strategy. This swift and decisive response aims to address the claims head-on and protect the integrity of their artists' work. The agency's commitment to defending against what they deem baseless accusations underscores the seriousness with which they are treating this legal challenge.

Why Is This NewJeans Plagiarism Controversy Significant for Music Fans?

The significance of the 'How Sweet' plagiarism controversy extends beyond a typical copyright dispute. 'How Sweet' achieved considerable global success, charting high on international music platforms like Billboard Global. Given its widespread popularity, this lawsuit brings critical attention to copyright issues within the global K-pop industry. It raises important questions about creative ownership, the process of demo submissions, and the legal frameworks governing international music collaborations. Fans are keenly watching how this situation unfolds, as it could set precedents for future disputes involving K-pop artists operating on the world stage.

What Are the Legal Issues at Play in the 'How Sweet' Lawsuit?

The core legal issue in the 'How Sweet' lawsuit revolves around alleged similarities between the plaintiffs' demo track, 'One of a Kind,' and NewJeans' hit song. The plaintiffs contend that specific melodic sequences, tempo, and key are shared between the two songs, constituting copyright infringement. Their claim is that their original work was used without proper credit or compensation. The legal battle will likely involve expert musicologists analyzing the compositions to determine the extent of the similarities and whether they cross the threshold of infringement. Furthermore, the lawsuit seeks royalty payments, highlighting the financial stakes involved. The outcome could have implications for how demo materials are handled and licensed in the music industry, particularly for artists with a significant international presence.

What Is the Potential Impact of the 'How Sweet' Controversy on K-Pop Copyright?

Considering the global reach and popularity of 'How Sweet,' this plagiarism accusation has the potential to become a significant issue for K-pop copyright discussions worldwide. As K-pop groups like NewJeans continue to achieve international success, understanding and respecting intellectual property rights becomes increasingly crucial. This case could lead to greater scrutiny of music production processes, demo sharing protocols, and the legal protections afforded to songwriters and composers in cross-border collaborations. Fans and industry professionals alike will be observing the proceedings closely, as the resolution could influence how copyright is managed within the burgeoning global K-pop market and potentially lead to stricter guidelines or clearer legal precedents for the industry.

For more details, check the original source below.

Tags

#NewJeans#How Sweet#Plagiarism Lawsuit#ADOR#Copyright#K-pop#Music Law

Original Source

Read the Korean original

View Original →

Related Articles