NewJeans' hit song 'How Sweet' is facing a formal plagiarism lawsuit filed by a US composer, adding to existing controversy surrounding 'Bubble Gum.' As of 2026, the truth behind these allegations is under intense scrutiny, with fans and industry watchers eager for resolution.
What are the specific plagiarism claims against NewJeans' 'How Sweet'?
According to reports, a US-based composer has filed a lawsuit alleging that NewJeans' track 'How Sweet' plagiarizes their original work. The plaintiff claims that the melody and lyrics of 'How Sweet,' particularly in its first verse, bear a striking resemblance in both quantity and quality to an instrumental track they created in early 2024. The composer is seeking damages and a share of royalties, framing the alleged infringement as a clear act of copying. This detailed accusation has captured significant attention from fans and the broader public, escalating the situation beyond mere speculation.
What plagiarism allegations surround the song 'Bubble Gum' from the same album?
NewJeans' song 'Bubble Gum' has also faced plagiarism accusations. Similarities were pointed out between 'Bubble Gum' and a 1982 song by the British band Shakatak. The original artist's side reportedly raised objections to ADOR and the Korea Music Copyright Association. In response, ADOR has strongly denied these claims, stating that their composers had never heard the Shakatak song. It's highly unusual for two songs from the same album to become embroiled in copyright disputes with artists from different countries. Despite ADOR submitting analyses from music experts, these new allegations from the US lawsuit cast a shadow over the group's work.
How are these plagiarism controversies impacting NewJeans' activities, following the contract dispute?
The members of NewJeans have already lost the first trial in their lawsuit seeking to nullify their exclusive contracts with ADOR. With the team's return to activities uncertain and differing stances among members, the internal atmosphere is complex. The addition of a plagiarism lawsuit, with both HYBE and ADOR named as defendants, further complicates matters. The companies' legal strategies and responses will significantly influence NewJeans' future activities. Amidst these compounded challenges, fans express growing concern and diverse opinions about the group's path forward.
What is the current truth regarding the NewJeans plagiarism controversy as of 2026?
As of 2026, no definitive truth has been established regarding the plagiarism claims against 'How Sweet' or the allegations surrounding 'Bubble Gum.' The lawsuit filed by the US composer is in its early stages, and legal proceedings will be necessary to verify the claims made by both parties. The dispute concerning 'Bubble Gum' and Shakatak has also not been fully resolved. While ADOR continues to deny the plagiarism allegations, the simultaneous existence of these two copyright disputes raises concerns about NewJeans' image and future career. Based on industry experience, such legal battles can be protracted, and a final verdict may take considerable time.
What common mistakes do people make when discussing the NewJeans plagiarism lawsuits?
A frequent error made by fans and the public when encountering these plagiarism controversies is jumping to conclusions. It's common to either condemn the artists and their agency based solely on allegations or to offer unconditional defense. However, copyright infringement is a complex legal matter requiring thorough examination. It's crucial to consider both sides' arguments and await the outcomes of legal proceedings before forming definitive judgments. Rushing to judgment can lead to unfair accusations or misplaced loyalty, hindering a balanced understanding of the situation.
For more details, check the original source below.
